Addenda and Corrigenda

Document Contents

1. Translation
2. Index of Persons
3. Index of Places

Since the publication of the Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III Preserved in The National Archives. Volume I: 1–8 Henry III 1216–1224, eds Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland, technical editors Arianna Ciula & José Miguel Vieira (Woodbridge, 2007) and Calendar of the Fine Rolls of the Reign of Henry III Preserved in The National Archives. Volume II: 9–18 Henry III 1224–1234, eds Paul Dryburgh & Beth Hartland, technical editors Arianna Ciula & José Miguel Vieira (Woodbridge, 2008) a number of errors and omissions in the translation and indexes of both volumes has been identified. These have been amended in the online edition. A list of these now follows.

1. Translation

1.1. Volume I: 1216–1224

p. 3 (CFR 1216–17, no. 10) – replaced ‘Mouhaut’ with ‘Mohaut’ and ‘Roger de Mouhaut’ with ‘Roger de Mohaut’.
p. 34 (CFR 1217–18, no. 154) – replaced ‘Seaton’ with ‘Seaton Carew’ and ‘Walter de Karro’ with ‘Walter of Carew’.¹
p. 48 (CFR 1217–18, nos. 232-234) – replaced ‘Thomas Gravenel’ with ‘Thomas de Gravenel’.
p. 50 (CFR 1217–18, no. 248) – replaced ‘Ralph de Barewe’ with ‘Ralph of Barrow’.
p. 59 (CFR 1218–19, no. 44) – replaced ‘Thomas of Gravenley’ with ‘Thomas de Gravenel’.
p. 63 (CFR 1218–19, no. 44) – replaced ‘John de Nedheraven’’ with ‘John of Netheravon’.
p. 75 (CFR 1218–19, no. 119) – replaced ‘Thomas de Bavelingham’ with ‘Thomas de Balinghem’.
p. 88 (CFR 1218–19, no. 206) – replaced ‘Thomas of Gravenley’ with ‘Thomas de Gravenel’.
p. 94 (CFR 1218–19, no. 244) – replaced ‘Richard de Berneke’ with ‘Richard of Barnack’.
p. 100 (CFR 1218–19, no. 294) – replaced ‘half 1 m’ with ‘half a mark’.
p. 105 (CFR 1218–19, no. 321) – replaced ‘fall to her by inheritance’ with ‘fall to him by inheritance’.
p. 118 (CFR 1218–19, no. 406) – replaced ‘Menerel’ with ‘Meverel’.
p. 123 (CFR 1218–19, no. 439) – for ‘William de Marisco’ read ‘William Marsh’. This individual is the father of Jordan, father of William Marsh, the great-nephew of Geoffrey Marsh, justiciar of Ireland, who appears in entries CFR 1228–29, no. 303, CFR 1233–34, nos. 354, 390.
p. 123 (CFR 1218–19, no. 440) – replaced ‘Chunelby’ with ‘Thimbleby’.
p. 134 (CFR 1219–20, no. 67) – replaced ‘Asemardelvy’ with ‘Asemardeby’; replace ‘Baenburg’’ with ‘Baumber’.²
p. 143 (CFR 1219–20, no. 121) – replaced ‘Gaisl’’ with ‘Gazeley’.
p. 149 (CFR 1219–20, no. 163) – replaced ‘Henry of Rokeby’ with ‘Henry of Rugby’.³
p. 169 (CFR 1219–20, no. 294) – replaced ‘Shingham’ with ‘Sengham’.⁴
p. 175 (CFR 1220–21, no. 28) – replaced ‘church of Witekesho’ with ‘church of Wixoe’.
p. 177 (CFR 1220–21, no. 42) – replaced ‘Roger de Lanum’ with ‘Roger of Laneham’ and ‘Thomas de Lanum’ with ‘Laneham’.
p. 182 (CFR 1220–21, no. 101) – replaced ‘Humberston’ with ‘Humberstone’.
p. 187 (CFR 1220–21, no. 69) – replaced ‘Griffin de Sutton’’ with ‘Griffin of Sutton’, ‘Sutton’ with ‘Sutton Maddock’.
p. 196 (CFR 1220–21, no. 168) – replaced ‘Henry de Furnell’’ with ‘Henry de Furneaux’.
p. 223 (CFR 1220–21, no. 347) – replaced ‘William de Aumbly’ with ‘William de Amblie’.
p. 234 (CFR 1221–22, no. 24) – replaced ‘William of Spain’ with ‘William de Ispania’.
p. 240 (CFR 1221–22, no. 65) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 269 (CFR 1221–22, no. 254) – replaced ‘prior of Pyonia’ with ‘prior of Wormsley’.
p. 272 (CFR 1221-22), no. 276 - replaced ‘William de Sevkewurth’’ with ‘William of Seacourt’.
p. 284 (CFR 1222–23, no. 19) – replaced ‘Simon de Herbetinges’ with ‘Simon of Harpeting’.
p. 289 (CFR 1222–23, no. 55) – replaced ‘John Brown’ with ‘John le Brun’.
p. 299 (CFR 1222–23, no. 105) – replaced ‘Thorp’ with ‘Kingsthorpe’.
p. 301 (CFR 1222–23, no. 105) – replaced ‘Scassebi’ with ‘Scawsby’.
p. 302 (CFR 1222–23, no. 105) – replaced ‘Clentedon’’ with ‘Glanton’.
p. 309 (CFR 1222–23, nos. 152–153) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 315 (CFR 1222–23, no. 187) – replaced ‘Thomas de Bavelingham’ with ‘Thomas de Balinghem’.
p. 322 (CFR 1222–23, no. 236) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 323 (CFR 1222–23, nos. 246–247) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 364 (CFR 1223–24, no. 8) – replaced ‘William de Aumbly’ with ‘William de Amblie’.
p. 367 (CFR 1223–24, no. 199) – replaced ‘Levano’ with ‘Lovano’.
p. 377 (CFR 1223–24, no. 279) – replaced ‘Creeting’ with ‘Creeting St. Peter’.

1.2. Volume II: 1224–1234:

p. 15 (CFR 1224–25, no. 100) – replaced ‘Thomas de Tetteburne’ with ‘Thomas of Tedburn’.
p. 66 (CFR 1225–26, no. 45) – replaced ‘Killingthorp’ with ‘Kelleythorpe’.
p. 72 (CFR 1225–26, no. 89) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 78 (CFR 1225–26, no. 124) – replaced ‘Master William de Bancis’ with ‘Master William de Banke’.
p. 95 (CFR 1225–26, nos. 254–255) – replaced ‘John de Baalon’ with ‘John de Ballon’.
pp. 125-127 (CFR 1226–27, nos. 78, 86, 146 – replaced ‘Henry de Novant’’ with ‘Henry de Nonant’.
p. 144 (CFR 1226–27, no. 187) – replaced ‘Wythekesho’ with ‘Wixoe’.
p. 156 (CFR 1226–27, no. 265) – replaced ‘Thorp’ with ‘Kingsthorpe’.
p. 162 (CFR 1226–27, no. 302) – replaced ‘Lungvilers’ with ‘Longvillers’.
p. 169 (CFR 1226–27, no. 346) – replaced ‘Baldwin of Pointon’ with ‘Baldwin of Ponton’.
p. 192 (CFR 1227–28, no. 96) – replaced ‘Rose, who was the wife of …’ with ‘Rose, wife of …’⁵
p. 196 (CFR 1227–28, no. 126) – replaced ‘Lungvilers’ with ‘Longvillers’.
p. 213 (CFR 1227–28, no. 241) – replaced ‘Lungvilers’ with ‘Longvillers’.
p. 271 (CFR 1228–29, no. 322) – replaced ‘Ralph de Anvers’ with ‘Ralph de Auvers’.
p. 279 (CFR 1228–29, no. 414) – replaced ‘Richard de Witsand’’ with ‘Richard de Wissant’.
p. 301 (CFR 1229–30, nos. 102–103) – replaced ‘Peter de Bedinton’’ with ‘Peter of Beddington’.
p. 308 (CFR 1229–30, no. 157) – replaced ‘Killingthorp’ with ‘Kelleythorpe’.
p. 313 - (CFR 1229-30, no. 191 - replaced ‘Deulecresse the Jewess’ with ‘Deulecresse the Jew’.
p. 330 (CFR 1229–30, no. 310) – replaced ‘Cheriton’ with ‘Charlton Kings’.⁶
p. 374 (CFR 1230–31, no. 136) – replaced ‘Len’ with ‘King’s Lynn’.
p. 376 (CFR 1230–31, no. 147) – replaced ‘Thomas de Bavelingham’ with ‘Thomas de Balinghem’.
p. 383 (CFR 1230–31, no. 200) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 398 (CFR 1230–31, no. 312) – replaced ‘Thomas de Bavelingham’ with ‘Thomas de Balinghem’.
p. 401 (CFR 1230–31, no. 333) – replaced ‘Ricklinghall’ with ‘Rickinghall’.
p. 405 (CFR 1231–32, no. 18) – replaced ‘John Francigena’ with ‘John le Francis’.⁷
p. 406 (CFR 1231–32, no. 25) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
pp. 410–11 (CFR 1231–32, nos. 61, 63–64) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 427 (CFR 1231–32, nos. 184–185) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 451-2 (CFR 1232–33, nos. 24-25) – replaced ‘Guy de Rocheford’ with ‘Guy of Rochford’.
p. 465 (CFR 1232–33, no. 116) – replaced ‘Rocel’ de Hagebech’’ with ‘Rocelin of Hackbeach’.
p. 466 (CFR 1232–33, no. 122) – replaced ‘John French’ with ‘John le Francis’.
pp. 470–71 (CFR 1232–33, nos. 141–142, 144, 146, 148–150) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 492 (CFR 1230–31, nos. 272–274) – replaced ‘James de Bavelingham’ with ‘James de Balinghem’.
p. 498 (CFR 1232–33, nos. 297) – replaced ‘Geoffrey de Bancis’ with ‘Geoffrey de Banke’.
p. 512 (CFR 1232–33, no. 382) – replaced ‘Robert de Furnell’’ with ‘Robert de Furneaux’.
p. 522 (CFR 1233–34, no. 57) – replaced ‘Robert de Furnell’’ with ‘Robert de Furneaux’.
p. 543 (CFR 1233–34, nos. 203–204) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
pp. 548–49 (CFR 1233–34, nos. 233–234) – replaced ‘William de Heunton’’ with ‘William of Houghton’.
p. 549 (CFR 1233–34, no. 235) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 550 (CFR 1233–34, nos. 245–246) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
pp. 551–52 (CFR 1233–34, no. 253) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.
p. 574 (CFR 1233–34, no. 398) – replaced ‘Kennington’ with ‘Kempton’.

1.3. Volume III: 1224–1234

p. 9 – (CFR 1234-35, no. 9) - replaced ‘Hamo of Bathampton’ with ‘Hamo of Beckhampton’.
p. 33 – (CFR 1234-35, no. 183) - replaced ‘Giles of Waxham’ and ‘Isabella of Waxham’ with ‘Giles of Wattisham’ and ‘Isabella of Wattisham’.
p. 120 – (CFR 1235-36, no. 153) - replaced ‘Longstanton manor’ with ‘Fenstanton manor’.
p. 139 - (CFR 1235-36, no. 259 - replaced ‘Thomas of Plumborough’ and ‘Thomas of Plumberow’.
p. 126 – (CFR 1235-36, no. 187) - replaced ‘Trewhitt’ with ‘Thrunton’.
p. 395 - (CFR 1240-41), no. 272 - replaced ‘Richard de Halgheford’’ with ‘Richard of Halliford’.
p. 409 – (CFR 1240-41, no. 379) - footnote 2 should read ‘Entry cancelled because below. See no. 388 below’.
p. 463 – (CFR 1240-41, no. 715) - the footnote at no. 717 on p. 464 belongs to no. 715.
p. 499 – (CFR 1241-42, no. 104) - replaced ‘Geoffrey de Stokwell’’ with ‘Geoffrey of Stockwell’.
p. 520 – (CFR 1241-42, no. 221) - replaced ‘John of Waxham’ with ‘John of Wattisham’.

2. Index of Persons

2.1. Volume I: 1216–1224

p. 407 (under ‘Armenters, Geoffrey de’) – the entry 8/426 should not be listed.
p. 407 (under ‘Aubigny, William d’, Earl of Arundel (1221–1224’) – the entries 5/105; 7/294, 298–299; 8/310 should probably be associated with William d’Aubigny of Belvoir.
p. 409 (under ‘Barewe, Ralph de’) – the place has since been identified as Barrow in Thingoe hundred and this entry should now read ‘Barrow (Barewe) [Suffolk], Ralph of’.
p. 410 (under ‘Bavelingham, Thomas de’ and ‘Bavelingham, Mabel wife of Thomas de’) – the place has since been identified as Balinghem in the Pas-de-Calais département and these entries should now read ‘Balinghem (Bavelingeham, Bavelingham, Buvelingeham) [dep. Pas-de-Calais, France], Thomas de’ and ‘Balinghem (Bavelingeham, Bavelingham, Buvelingeham) [dep. Pas-de-Calais, France], Mabel wife of Thomas de’.
p. 410 (under ‘Baynard, Cassandra wife of Geoffrey’) – her actual husband is Robert Baynard and the entry should read ‘Baynard, Cassandra wife of Robert’.
p. 412 (under ‘Berneke, Richard de’) – the place has since been identified as Barnack in Nassaburgh hundred and this entry should now read ‘Barnack (Berneke) [Northamptonshire], Richard of’.
p. 417 (under ‘Brun, John le’) – the individual associated with the index entry number 7/55 has now been identified as ‘John le Brun’ who later became sheriff of Oxfordshire.
p. 427 (under ‘Despenser’) the relationship has been reversed to read ‘Despenser, Hugh, brother and heir of Thomas Despenser, 2/241’.
p. 433 (under ‘Furnell’, Henry de’) – the place has since been standardised to Furneaux, which has not been identified, and this entry should now read ‘Furneaux (Furnell’) [unidentified], Henry de’.
p. 433 (under ‘Geoffrey, William son of’) – this should probably be two individuals, one (relating to index entry number 4/215) fl. 1220 in Essex, the other (relating to index entry number 5/63) fl. 1221 in Warwickshire.
p. 435 (under 'Gravenel, Thomas' and 'Gravenley, Thomas of') - these two individuals should probably be combined as one person and the entry should now read ‘Gravenley (Cravenell’, Gravenel’), Thomas de’, 2/232-234, 3/19, 206.
p. 436 (under 'Ham (Hammes), Hamo of') - this place has been identified as Ham manor in Angmering parish, Sussex and the entry should now read ‘Ham (Hammes) [in Angmering, Sussex], Hamo of’, 3/394.
p. 439 (under ‘Henry III, Pentecost sergeant of’) – removed entries 3/298, 4/30, 7/221.
p. 439 (under ‘Herbetinges, de Simon’) – the place can be identified as Harpeting manor in Piddinghoe, Sussex and this entry should read 'Harpeting, Simon of'.
p. 443 (under ‘Karro, Walter de’) – the place can be identified as Carew in Narberth hundred and this entry should read ‘Carew (Karro) [Pembrokeshire], Walter of’.
p. 444 (under ‘Lacelles, Philip de’ and ‘Lacelles, Robert de’) – the place may possibly be identified as Loucelles in Calvados and these entries should read ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], Philip de’ and ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], Robert de’.
p. 444 (under ‘Lanum, Roger de’ and ‘Lanum, Thomas de’) – the place can be identified as Laneham in Bassetlaw wapentake and these entries should read ‘Laneham (Lanum) [Nottinghamshire], Roger of’ and ‘Laneham (Lanum) [Nottinghamshire], Thomas of’.
p. 451 for ‘Menerel’ – read ‘Meverel’.
p. 453 (for ‘Mouhaut, Roger de’) – read ‘Mohaut, Roger de’.
p. 454 (under ‘Nedheraven’, John de’) – the place can be identified as Netheravon in Elstub hundred and this entry should read ‘Netheravon (Nedheraven’) [Wiltshire], John of’.
p. 458 (under ‘Perry, Robert de’) – the place can be identified as Perry in Handsworth parish, hundred, and this entry should read ‘Perry (Perie, Pirie) [in Handsworth, Staffordshire], Robert of’.
p. 460 for ‘Pyonia, priory of’ read ‘Wormsley, priory of’
p. 461 (under ‘Ralph, William son of’) – this should probably be two individuals, one (relating to index entry numbers 2/195, 7/17, 78, 105), the other (relating to index entry numbers 3/357, 4/52) fl. 1219–20 in Lincolnshire.
p. 463 (under ‘Roche [Yorkshire, West Riding], abbey of’) – the entries associated with ‘Reginald, abbot of’ should be 6/167–168; 7/223 (6/68 being a mistake).
p. 464 (under ‘Roger, William son of’) – this should probably be two individuals, one fl. 1219 (Lincolnshire), the other fl. 1223 (Suffolk).
p. 464 (under ‘Rokeby, Henry of’) – this place should, in fact, be identified as Rugby in Warwickshire and the entry should now read ‘Rugby (Rokebi) [Warwickshire], Henry of’.
p. 468 (under ‘Sevkewurth’, William de’) - this place should be identified as Seacourt in Berkshire and the entry should now read ‘Seacourt (Sevekeuurth', Sevekewurth') [Wytham, Berkshire], William of’.
p. 469 (under ‘Spain, William of’) – William is probably a descendant of a Hervey de Ispania, who was possibly a Breton from Epinay, near Rennes and this entry should now read ‘Ispania (Ispin') [?Épinay, dep. Ille-et-Vilaine, France], William de’.
p. 471 (under ‘Sutton, Griffin de’) – the place has since been identified as Sutton Maddock in Brimstree hundred and this entry should now read ‘Sutton (Suttun') [Sutton Maddock, Shropshire], Griffin of’.

2.2. Volume II: 1224–1234:

p. 582 (under ‘Anvers, Ralph de’) – the place has since been identified as Auvers in Manche département and this entry should now read ‘Auvers [Manche, France], Ralph de’.
p. 583 (under ‘Ashley, Walter of’) – the place has since been identified as Ashley in Charlton Kings parish, Gloucestershire and this entry should now read ‘Ashley (Esslegh’), [in Charlton Kings, Gloucestershire], Walter of’.
p. 584 (under ‘Aumary, Robert’) – this individual is the same as Robert de Amary in volume I and the entry should therefore read ‘Amary (Aumary) [unidentified], Robert de, assessor and collector of the tallage of Oxfordshire, 18/126’.
p. 584 (under ‘Baalon, John de’ – the place has since been identified as Ballon in the Sarthe département and these entries should now read ‘Ballon (Baalon, Baalon’, Baalun, Balum, Balun) [dep. Sarthe, France], John de’.
p. 584 (under ‘Bancis, Geoffrey de’ – the place has since been identified as Banks in the parish of Kingston, Cambridgeshire and these entries should now read ‘Banke (Bancis, Banc’) [Kingston, Cambridgeshire], Geoffrey de’.
p. 584 (under ‘Bancis, Geoffrey de’ – the place has since been identified as Banks in the parish of Kingston, Cambridgeshire and these entries should now read ‘Banke (Bancis, Banc’) [Kingston, Cambridgeshire], Master William de’.
p. 586 (under ‘Bavelingham, Hilary wife of James de’, ‘Bavelingham, James de’ and ‘Bavelingham, Thomas de’) – the place has since been identified as Balinghem in the Pas-de-Calais département and these entries should now read ‘Balinghem (Bavelingeham, Bavelingham, Buvelingeham) [dep. Pas-de-Calais, France], Hilary widow of James de’, ‘Balinghem (Bavelingham, Buvelingeham) [dep. Pas-de-Calais, France], James de’ and ‘Balinghem (Bavelingham, Buvelingeham) [dep. Pas-de-Calais, France], Thomas de’.
p. 587 (under ‘Bedinton’, Peter de’) – the place has since been identified as Beddington in Wallington hundred and this entry should now read ‘Beddington (Bedenton’, Bedinton’) [Surrey], Peter of’.
pp. 588, 653 (under ‘Bigod, Matilda widow of Hugh’ and ‘Warenne, Matilda wife of William de’) – this is one individual, subsequently the countess of Surrey and their entries should be unified.
p. 597 (under ‘Chilham, Rose who was the wife of’) – her husband was not, in fact, dead, and this entry should read ‘Chilham, Rose wife of Richard of’.⁸
p. 606 (under ‘Falconer, Henry of’) – this entry should read ‘Falconer (le Faucuner), Henry, of Humberstone [Lincolnshire]’.
p. 608 (under ‘Francigena, John’ and ‘French, John’) – this entry should now read ‘Francis (Francigena, Franceis, le), John le’.
p. 609 (under ‘Furnell’, Robert de’) – the place has since been standardised to Furneaux, which has not been identified, and this entry should now read ‘Furneaux (Furnell’) [unidentified], Robert de’.
p. 612 (under ‘Hagebech’, Rocel’ de’) – the place has since been identified as Hackbeack in Emneth parish, Freebridge Marshland hundred, and this entry should now read ‘Hackbeach (Hagebech’) [in Emneth, Norfolk], Rocelin of’.
p. 615 (under ‘Heunton’, William de’) – the place has since been identified as Houghton in Hurstingstone hundred, and this entry should now read ‘Houghton (Heunton’) [Huntingdonshire], William of’.
p. 620 (under ‘Karro, Walter de’) – the place can be identified as Carew in Narberth hundred and this entry should read ‘Carew (Karro) [Pembrokeshire], Walter of’.
p. 620 (under ‘Killingthorp, Ralph de’) – the place can be identified as Kelleythorpe in Great Driffield parish, Harthill wapentake and this entry should read ‘Kelleythorpe (Killingthorp’) [in Great Driffield, Yorkshire, East Riding], Ralph of’.
p. 620 (under ‘Lacelles, Duncan de’, ‘Lacelles, Picot’ de’, ‘Lacelles, Thomas de’ and ‘Lacelles, William de’) – the place may possibly be identified as Loucelles in Calvados and these entries should read ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lascel’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], Duncan de’, ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lascel’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], Picot’ de’, ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lascel’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], Thomas de’ and ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lascel’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], William de’.
p. 624 (under ‘Lungvilers, Eudo de’) – the place can be identified as Longvillers in Calvados département and this entry should read ‘Longvillers (Lunguilers) [in Calvados, France], Eudo de’.
p. 629 (under ‘Montfort, Simon de’) – the Earl of Leicester (d. 1265) has, of course, been conflated with his father, another Simon. The entries 15/263, 16/69 and 18/18 should therefore appear under ‘Montfort (Monteforti, Munteford’, Muntford’) [Montfort-sur-Risle, dep. Eure, France], Simon de, Earl of Leicester (1239–1265)’.
p. 632 (under ‘Novant (Novat’), Henry de’) – the place can be identified as Nonant in Calvados département and this entry should read ‘Nonant, (Novat', Nunaunt) [in Calvados, France], Henry de’
p. 635 (under ‘Peverel, Hugh’) – this should be two individuals, one (relating to index entries 9/369, 11/174, 13/170 and 14/258) who died c. 1230, the other (relating to index entry number 18/126) who was assessor and collector of the tallage of Devon in 1234.
p. 636 (under ‘Pointon (Panton’, Pointon’, Pointun’, Poyniton’), Alexander of’ and ‘Pointon (Panton’, Pointon’, Pointun’, Poyniton’), Baldwin of’) – Alexander did indeed emanate from Pointon in Sempringham parish (Lincolnshire), but Baldwin originated from Little Ponton in the same county. Therefore, only the variant ‘Panton’’ should be associated with Baldwin and it should be removed from Pointon altogether. These entries should now read ‘Pointon (Pointon’, Pointun’, Poyniton’) [in Sempringham, Lincolnshire], Alexander of’ and ‘Pointon (Panton’) [Ponton, Little, Lincolnshire], Baldwin of’.⁹
p. 639 (under 'Rocheford, Guy de') - the place has been identified as Rochford, Essex and this entry should read 'Rochford (Rocheford'), Guy of'.
p. 645 (under ‘Siward, Phillippa wife of Richard’) – she should be identified as ‘Beaumont, Phillippa, wife of Henry de, Countess of Warwick (1213–1229)’.
p. 649 (under ‘Tetteburne, Thomas de’) – the place can be identified as Tedburn St. Mary in Wonford hundred and this entry should read ‘Tedburn (Tetteburne) [Tedburn St. Mary, Devon], Thomas of’.
p. 651 (under ‘Verly, Hugh de’) – this should probably be two individuals, one (relating to index entry numbers 11/318-19, 351) fl. 1227, the other (relating to index entry number 17/336).
p. 656 (under ‘Witsand’, Robert de’) – the place can be identified as Wissant in the Pas de Calais département, while ‘Robert’ should read ‘Richard’ as in the calendar text, and this entry should read ‘Wissant (Witsand’) [in Pas de Calais, France], Richard de’.

2.3. Volume III: 1234-1242:

p. 600 (under ‘Ashley, Walter of’) – the place has since been identified as Ashley in Charlton Kings parish, Gloucestershire and this entry should now read ‘Ashley (Aspel’, Esslegh’, Esseleya, Esshelegh), [in Charlton Kings, Gloucestershire], Walter of’.
pp.604-5 (under ‘Bathampton, Walter of’) - the place has since been identified as Beckhampton in Avebury parish, Wiltshire and this entry should now read ‘Beckhampton (Bachampton', Bathampton', Bathamton') [in Avebury, Wiltshire], Hamo of’
p.607 (under ‘Bertram, Roger’) - the identification of this Roger Bertram [of Mitford] as the son and heir of Richard Bertram is incorrect, and should belong to another individual, Roger Bertram [of Bothal] who has been added to the electronic index.¹⁰
p.609 (under ‘Bolbec, Hugh de’) - the references to Hugh under 25/819 as 'keeper of the castle of Newcastle upon Tyne', 'keeper of the castle of Bamburgh' and 'sheriff of Northumberland' actually belong under to his son, also Hugh de Bolbec.
p. 621 (under 'Cobham, John of') - the place has since been identified as Cobham in Kent.
p. 635 (under ‘Freemantle, Nigel of’) – the parish in which Freemantle is located has since been identified as Kingsclere, Hampshire and this entry should now read ‘Freemantle (Freyt Mauntel), [in Kingsclere, Hampshire], Nigel of’.
p. 641 (under ‘Halgheford' [unidentified], Richard de’) - the place has since been identified as Halliford, Upper and Lower in Middlesex and this entry should read ‘Halliford (Halgheford') [Middlesex], Richard of’.
p. 648 (under ‘Huure (Hourre) [unidentified], Joan de’) - the place has since been identified as Iver in Buckinghamshire and this entry should read ‘Iver (Eure, Houre, Huure) [Buckinghamshire], Joan of’.
p. 654 (under ‘Lacelles, Philip de’, and ‘Lacelles, William de’) – the place may possibly be identified as Loucelles in Calvados and these entries should read ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lascel’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], Philip de’ and ‘Lascelles (Ascell’, Lascel’, Lasceles), [?Loucelles, dep. Calvados, France], William de’.
p. 675 (under ‘Plumborough, Christiana wife of Thomas of’ and ‘Plumborough (Plumberegh', Plumberg') [in Southminster, Essex], Thomas of’) - the place has since been identified as Plumberow Mount in Hockley parish in Essex and these entries should now read ‘Plumberow, Christiana wife of Thomas of’ and ‘Plumberow (Plumbergh', Plumberewe, Plumberg', Plumberegh) [in Hockley, Essex], Thomas of’
p. 689 (under ‘Stokwell' [unidentified], Geoffrey of’) – the place has since been identified as Stockwell in Oxfordshire and this entry should now read ‘Stockwell (Stocwell', Stokwell') [Oxfordshire], Geoffrey of’.
p. 696 (under ‘Upnor (Upenor) [in Frindsbury, Kent], Walter of [junior]’) - the parish has since been corrected to New Windsor, Berkshire and this entry should now read ‘Upnor (Upavene, Upenor, Uppenor') [in Windsor, New, Berkshire], Walter of [junior]’.
p. 697 (under ‘Wakering (Wakering’, Wakeringes, Waking’) [Essex], Peter of’) - the entries 22/38, 22/41 and 23/206 ought to be under Peter as ‘keeper of the manor of Taunton’ not ‘keeper of the honour of Taunton’.
p. 699 (under ‘Waxham (Wachesham, Waxtunesham) [Waxham, Norfolk], Giles of’) – the place has since been identified as Wattisham in Suffolk and this entry should now read ‘Wattisham (Wachesham) [Suffolk], Giles of’.
p. 699 (under ‘Waxham (Wachesham, Waxtunesham) [Waxham, Norfolk], Isabella of’) – the place has since been identified as Wattisham in Suffolk and this entry should now read ‘Wattisham (Wachesham) [Suffolk], Giles of’.
p. 699 (under ‘Waxham (Wachesham, Waxtunesham) [Waxham, Norfolk], John of’) – the place has since been identified as Wattisham in Suffolk and this entry should now read ‘Wattisham (Wachesham) [Suffolk], Giles of’.

3. Index of Places

3.1. Volume I: 1216–1224

p. 485 (under ‘’Algarkirk’) – added the entry 3/173.
p. 485 – ‘Asemardelvy’ replaced with ‘Asemardeby’. This could be identified with an Ashby near Horncastle, but it is not clear which.
p. 486 – ‘Baenburg’’ has now been identified as ‘Baumber [Lincolnshire]’.
p. 486 – ‘Bampton’ is in Oxfordshire not Devon.
p. 495 – ‘Chunelby’ is a misreading of ‘Thimelby’ which can be identified as ‘Thimbleby’ in Osmotherley parish in Allerton wapentake in the North Riding of Yorkshire.
p. 495 – ‘Clentedon’’ can be identified as ‘Glanton’ in Whittingham parish in Coquetdale in Northumberland.
p. 497 – ‘Creeting (Creting’) [unidentified, Suffolk] vill of’ – this has been identified as Creeting St. Peter.
p. 497 – ‘Croft (Croft’) [Herefordshire] manor of’ – this manor is in Lincolnshire, not Herefordshire.
p. 503 – ‘Gaisl’’ has now been identified as ‘Gazeley [Suffolk]’.
p. 507 – (under ‘Humberston’) – this ought to read ‘Humberstone (Humberstan’, Humbrestan’) [unidentified, Leicestershire]’.
p. 508 – (under ‘Kennington’) – this has been mis-identified. It should read ‘Kempton (Keninton’) [Middlesex]’.
p. 510 – (under ‘Lambeth’) – for ‘Lambere’ read ‘LambeÞe’.
p. 519 – replaced ‘Pyonia, priory of’ with ‘Wormsley, priory of [Herefordshire]’.
p. 523 – added ‘Scawsby (Scassebi) [in Brodsworth, Yorkshire, West Riding], 7/105’.
p. 523 – ‘Seaton’ can be identified as ‘Seaton Carew’ in Stranton parish in Stockton wapentake, Durham.
p. 523 – ‘Shingham’ should, in fact, be ‘Sengham’, a lost location in Norfolk.
p. 527 – added ‘Sutton Maddock’, a parish in Brimstree hundred, Shropshire.
p. 528 – ‘Thorp’ has been identified as ‘Kingsthorpe’, a parish in Spelhoe hundred, Northamptonshire.
p. 530 – ‘Vuesdon’’ has been identified as ‘Ousden’, a parish in Risbridge hundred, Suffolk. The variant is better given as ‘Uvesdon’’.
p. 534 – ‘Witekesho, church of [unidentified, Essex] has since been identified as Wixoe church in Risbridge hundred, Suffolk.
p. 534 – ‘Woodcroft’ is in Etton parish, Northamptonshire, not Yorkshire.

3.2. Volume II: 1224–1234:

p. 668 (under ‘Cheriton [unidentified]’) – the place can be identified as Charlton Kings in Cheltenham parish, Gloucestershire.
p. 678 (under ‘Hampshire, forest of’) – this place should actually have been indexed as Bere [Hampshire], forest.
p. 682 – (under ‘Kennington’) – all three examples in which letters were attested there – in Berkshire, Kent and Surrey – have been mis-identified. They should be united and read ‘Kempton (Keneton’, Keninton’, Keniton’) [Middlesex]’.
p. 683 – (under ‘Kennington’) – all three examples in which letters were attested there – in Berkshire, Kent and Surrey – have been mis-identified. They should be united and read ‘Kempton (Keneton’, Keninton’, Keniton’) [Middlesex]’.
p. 683 (under ‘Killingthorp’) – the place can be identified as Kelleythorpe in Great Driffield parish, Harthill wapentake.
p. 683 (under ‘Kentwell’) – the place can be identified as Kentwell in Long Melford parish, Babergh hundred.
p. 684 – an entry for King's Mill (Kingesmulne) [in Cowley, Oxfordshire] was omitted from the index. It is 9/6.
p. 685 – (under ‘Len’) - the place has since been identified as King's Lynn [Norfolk].
pp. 686–87 – entries for London, St. Martin’s deanery were omitted from the index. These are 9/246; 12/168; 13/288-9; 15/137, 151–152, 295–296; 17/119.
p. 695 – ‘Ricklinghall’ has been changed to ‘Rickinghall’.
p. 703 – ‘Thorp’ has been identified as ‘Kingsthorpe’, a parish in Spelhoe hundred, Northamptonshire.
p. 704 – entries for the forest of ‘Trivel’ were omitted from the index. These are 10/195; 11/94; 14/197; 15/281; 17/62, 171. This can be identified and the entry should now read ‘Treville (Trivel) [Herefordshire], forest’.
p. 707 - the entry for 'Wexcombe (Wexcumbe) [in Grafton, Wiltshire]', the parish has since been identified as Great Bedwyn, Wiltshire.
p. 708 – an entry for Winchester, Chapmans Hall (Linea Selda) [Hampshire] was omitted from the index. It is 17/189.
p. 710 – ‘Wythekesho [unidentified, Suffolk]’ has since been identified as Wixoe in Risbridge hundred, Suffolk.

3.3. Volume III: 1234–1242:

p. 708 – the entry 20/559 under ‘Ashley [Wiltshire]’ should read ‘Ashley [Cambridgeshire]’.
p. 726 – the entry for Hexham [Northumberland] should not have read ‘letters attested at’.
p. 731 – the entry 20/153 under ‘Longstanton [Cambridgeshire], manor of’ should be under ‘Fenstanton [Huntingdonshire], manor of’.
p. 745 – the entry 22/41 under ‘Taunton, honour’ should be under ‘Taunton, manor of’.
p. 747 – the entry 20/187 under ‘Trewhitt’ hss since been identified as Thrunton in Whittingham parish, Northumberland.¹¹
p. 749 – entries for Wexcombe (Wexcumb', Wexcumbe) [in Grafton, Wiltshire] manor of, the parish has since been identified as Great Bedwyn, Wiltshire.
p. 751 – the entry for Woodstock [Oxfordshire] the entry 26/239 should be under ‘letters attested at’.

Footnotes

1.: Thanks to Dr. Matthew Holford for this identification. Back to context...
2.: Thanks to Dr. Jonathan Mackman for these identifications. Back to context...
3.: Thanks to Dr. Jonathan Mackman for this identification. Back to context...
4.: Thanks to Edward Beaumont for this identification. Back to context...
5.: Thanks to Richard Cassidy for his assistance with Richard of Chilham and his wife. Back to context...
6.: Thanks to Professor Nicholas Vincent for this identification. Back to context...
7.: Thanks to Dr. Paul Brand for this identification. Back to context...
8.: Thanks to Richard Cassidy for his assistance with Richard of Chilham and his wife. Back to context...
9.: Thanks to Dr. Jonathan Mackman for these identifications. Back to context...
10.: Thanks to Dr. Amanda Beam-Frazier for this identification. Back to context...
11.: Thanks to David X. Carpenter for this identification. Back to context...

The Henry III Fine Rolls Project

Addenda and Corrigenda

Document Contents

1. Translation

1.1. Volume I: 1216–1224

1.2. Volume II: 1224–1234:

1.3. Volume III: 1224–1234

2. Index of Persons

2.1. Volume I: 1216–1224

2.2. Volume II: 1224–1234:

2.3. Volume III: 1234-1242:

3. Index of Places

3.1. Volume I: 1216–1224

3.2. Volume II: 1224–1234:

3.3. Volume III: 1234–1242:

Footnotes

Document Contents